Showing posts from August 4, 2013
AA Insurance have added progress figures for July here.It is interesting to note that so far AAI have completed only four rebuilds out of a total 674. Of the 674 nearly half (326) have been cash settled which, on the face of it, suggests a full replacement policy isn’t all it was advertised to be..
- Other Apps
The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) has published the media release for the policy decision on managing earthquake-prone buildings (here).Part of the release states: The new system is designed to strike a better balance between protecting people from harm in an earthquake and managing the costs of strengthening or removing earthquake prone buildings.When the performance of the MBIE (DBH as it then was) on acceptable floor levels in damaged houses is taken into account (see blog entry here), there is room for concern that this piece of policy is potentially just as dubious. Once again the balance seems to have moved further in favour of protecting business interests by transferring the risks onto people. A primary part of the policy is to extend the amount of time available in which to strengthen a building identified as being earthquake-prone. The policy proposes that Councils have five years from the date of the new legislation in which to identify all earthq…
- Other Apps
Today’s Press has an article by Lane Neave law firm partner Dr Duncan Webb on insurers changing a rebuild into a repair. This article is part of an on-going "agony uncle" series on how the law applies to certain situations.The article is here, and worth reading. There is also an e-mail address at the bottom of the article if you have a question you would like to submit..