EQC e-Newsletter for March: claims settlement and Green Zone TC3 information
EQC's March e-Newsletter (here) contains:
The topic headings on the claims settlement page are shown below. Some of the answers are a bit dubious, and will require further work. The most obvious case relates to question 7, where EQC is of the view that specific damage cannot be allocated to a particular event.
- new information on claims settlement
- information on TC3 geotechnical assessments
- a White Zone update
- statistics on the number of full repairs done
The topic headings on the claims settlement page are shown below. Some of the answers are a bit dubious, and will require further work. The most obvious case relates to question 7, where EQC is of the view that specific damage cannot be allocated to a particular event.
- Why is the settlement of building and land claims from Canterbury such a big task?
- So what is so complex about multi-event claims?
- What is apportionment?
- Why does EQC need to apportion the damage where it occurred over multiple events?
- How does apportionment affect my claims?
- How does EQC know which events caused what damage, if an assessment was not done after each event?
- What do I do if I don’t agree with how EQC has apportioned damage?
- What does the court ruling have to do with this?
- How will the High Court’s declaratory judgment affect my claim?
- How long are claims taking to process under this new process?